For the most part, response to the article I shared in lastweek's blog was positive. Those who were
upset by it mostly kept quiet, which I consider to be the high road, and
appreciate. I had some people disagree
with me, which was also fine, in that I could listen to them and then move
on. I don't need the world to agree with
me on my personal opinions.
I chose to write that article for a couple of reasons. Right now, Jewish Family Services
("JFS") has paired with National Alliance for Mental Illnesses (NAMI)
to do a mental health awareness campaign.
So far as I can tell, this largely involves sending out fliers that
proclaim, "It's okay to talk about it." Not that I don't appreciate the funds spent
on the fliers, but visibility, especially for something with this much stigma
attached, takes a little more effort than that.
The other, connected-but-not-identical reason, is that I
think visibility is important in and of itself.
Regardless of my community's "push" for it, just standing up
and saying, "Hey, I have this problem," allows other people with the
problem to feel less alone. More than
that, it allows them to feel less broken.
So, why did I write the article? I've talked about visibility before in this
blog, and I will probably talk about it again.
As far as I'm concerned, particularly for persons with mental illness
who are out in the day-to-day world, visibility is the number one issue facing
mental health awareness. As such:
I did it for the mom who contacted me and said, "Thank
you," because her daughter suffers from mental illness.
I did it for the wife who called me, and thanked me, because
after reading it, her husband finally opened up and talked a little bit about
his depression.
I did it for the aunt who talked to me about her nephew's
struggles.
I did it because mental illness, by definition, is
invisible. If I get up in the morning,
and do what I am supposed to do, be that work, or chores, or my volunteer
positions, I must not be depressed because depressed people don't get out of
bed. Complete, disabling depression is
really the only "visible" kind.
And even there, the problem is still invisible, which is why persons who
are entirely disabled by it get comments like, "You just need to try
harder," or "Staying in bed isn't working for you, why don't you try
something else?"
I recently read about a friend of mine's mother asking her
why she was so depressed when her life was going so well. She had no "reason" to be
depressed.
My friend's nephew, who's in his teens, said, "Saying
you don't understand why a person is depressed because their life is going well
is like saying 'I don't know why you have asthma, there's plenty of air in
here.'"
Asthma is visible.
Nobody doubts somebody is asphyxiating, or thinks someone is doing it
for attention, or because they're just not thinking positively about it. This is the same with every virus, bacterial
infection or disease we can "see" in some way.
Depression, particularly depression in functional
depressives, is invisible, which heightens the isolation that the disease
already causes. If you are able, if it
is safe, and you are comfortable, standing up and saying, "Hey, I have
this disease," takes just that little tiny bit of stigma away. It might let one person know she is not
alone. It might let another person say
aloud, "I have that, too," which might affect yet another
person. You never know. But it might.
No comments:
Post a Comment